Post by maketradefair on Sept 23, 2003 12:52:31 GMT -5
no, i wouldnt like to see them do it, cos it means if they have say 2 albums worth of songs on the one album they would only have one tour for it. were as if they realised 2 albums, they would tour twice..
i really dindt explain that well.. but i hope you know what im getting at!..
Post by daysleeper on Sept 23, 2003 13:59:00 GMT -5
it all depends on the quality of the material. theres no point in releasing a 30 track double album if half the songs aren't up to scratch. if they have the material or a concept behind the album (a la Floyd) then it would be worth doing
personally i can't see it. and why bother really? just release one album one year and another the next. it used to be that bands released albums whenever they wanted - now it seems like bands can only release one album every 2/3 years.
Make your money with exploitation Make it holy illumination Say a prayer at every station Don't forget to ask for mercy Make your money with a pretty face Make it easy with product placement Make it charged with controversy I'm straight, I'm queer, I'm bi
i don't think its the right thing to do these days. I just don't think its worth it. If the overall album is bad, then the few good songs will go unnoticed and will go to waste. Also, if the songs are good, then spread it over two albums. It just means more money, more publicity and more touring. Also, the price would probably be higher, and that means that most of the north american market wouldn't touch it.
I think they should do what Metallica and Guns n' Roses did and just release a double album as two separate albums. Like the "Use Your Illusion" albums and "Load" and "Re-Load". They should record two albums worth of material and either release it together (if the record all the songs within the due date of the album) or just release one album and work on the next album and then tour after the second one is released.
na noel's too lazy. he says it gonna be till 2005 till the new one comes out and that is gonna just be a standard album. if there's double the tracks it'll be 2007 and i dunno about u lot but i cant wait that long!!!
How about a new album with 1 cd being the new tunes and the second, a dvd with a documentry on it and extra stuff. I would probably forgive the band if they gave us that. I would definately wait (probably because we aint got a choice) till 2005.
AdidasNG72: Seeing as BHN is my favourite album of all time, yes I agree 100%. BHN is a unique masterpiece in its own right, and something that will never be attempted by another band ever again, as no band will ever be as big as Oasis again.
Apr 9, 2021 13:02:10 GMT -5
summersox: the-soapbox.net is BACK, baybeeeeee! Ever punched anyone to Oasis?
May 20, 2021 11:39:58 GMT -5
Mad4it: As anyone got the full concert footage knebworth
May 21, 2021 9:25:03 GMT -5
bestwick8: whatever happened to the tiktok ama ?
May 26, 2021 19:15:19 GMT -5
shirleyroadshow: I gave the band a slot on my roadshow for ITV telethon production in June 1992. My brother worked with Boneheads brother Martin Arthurs and we were producing a 24 hour on/off LIVE event. The band were very much together at that time!
May 29, 2021 8:24:29 GMT -5
tongaoasis07: Listening to this remaster i must admit it sounds awesome!!
Jul 6, 2021 23:19:09 GMT -5
welshylad: what remaster
Jul 8, 2021 8:28:35 GMT -5
tongaoasis07: don't remember... but for sure it was one from the thieving magpie! hahaha
Jul 14, 2021 21:15:48 GMT -5
BugmenAndBoxes: I was catching up on the Matt Morgan podcast and got to the part where Noel refuses to let Matt tell the story of how Dead In The Water was written, but does mention it was written in response to thinking he could one up a song he heard... Bold?
Aug 9, 2021 13:17:42 GMT -5
artumlobov: He failed
Sept 5, 2021 12:32:36 GMT -5
Wolf: I don't think he did
Sept 9, 2021 11:27:03 GMT -5