|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jan 15, 2023 15:45:45 GMT -5
can't wait for james hargreaves' take on this and how we can find all the clues that lead up to today in noel's back catalouge, starting in 1988 with "gotta have fun". epic 2 hours video to be released soon! James Hargreaves explaining that Noel's divorces are all part the "The Masterplan." Or how Noel’s divorce is proof that Tom Meighan is innocent. |
|
|
|
Post by garylineker on Jan 15, 2023 15:49:56 GMT -5
James Hargreaves explaining that Noel's divorces are all part the "The Masterplan." Or how Noel’s divorce is proof that Tom Meighan is innocent. Tom comes across as totally deranged on them videos. He even said that he doubts Liam would want Kasabian supporting him if he was frontman because it would be a "threat". Is he joking? Deluded. |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jan 15, 2023 16:00:42 GMT -5
Silly season on Live4ever as ever, usually happens pre-album but fuelled by a tabloid gossipy divorce. It's a free for all.
But allegedly, Sara got suspicious of Noel's obsession at having the buttoned end of the duvet at the head of the bed... one night, she woke up to find him lying beside her sneakily munching on a pork pie. Absolutely furious, she tore the buttoned end open to find a smorgasbord of meat feast snacks, cakes and crisps hidden in the duvet. Never forgave him.
Hey, it still makes more sense than the bollocks James Hargreaves comes up with.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Chief on Jan 15, 2023 16:59:45 GMT -5
Noel's been planning this for 23 years. The Oasis record, "Standing on the Shoulder of Giants" is the first clue. The word "Standing" which reprensents one's wealth and social status, and "giant" which means Oasis because of the phrase said by a radio commentator, which would later be used in the Supersonic documentary trailer saying that they had become one of Britain's true giants. So he knew she would be getting a certain standing because of how rich he was. However, the "s" in "shoulder" was not included in the title. Noel said it was because he was inebriated but in reality, the "s" is the first letter of the word "she" as in "She is Love" as well as "Sarah".
Then, on "She Is Love", Noel says "Cause my heart's been keeping old" showing that he knew something would happen between him and "she", meaning Sarah, when he would be old.
Now, Don't Believe The Truth is an enigmatic title. But it's actually Noel saying he won't believe it when they divorce even if it's the harsh reality. But, The Importance of Being Idle means that he knows how important it is to let things be and accept them and become "Part of the Queue" meaning just like everyone else.
Dig Out Your Soul starts with "Bag It Up" which reprents him packing his bags up to move out because his life is "Turning" around. "Waiting for the Rapture" talks about how they met but the rapture comes in the end, showing he knew his relationship would eventually die and he'd feel an important shock as hard as the shock of a lightning after which he would be falling down.
There you go James, I started a script for you. But I can't be arsed to go on ha ha!
|
|
|
|
Post by heathenchemist01 on Jan 15, 2023 17:17:52 GMT -5
I know most of it is tongue in cheek but the conspiracy theories on this forum never fail to crack me up.
|
|
|
|
Post by megyesitomate on Jan 15, 2023 17:27:11 GMT -5
Now his gigs are going to be just him performing Sittin’ Here in Silence (On My Own) 22 times. Awful value for money.
|
|
yogurt
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 363
|
Post by yogurt on Jan 15, 2023 17:28:08 GMT -5
James Hargreaves explaining that Noel's divorces are all part the "The Masterplan." Or how Noel’s divorce is proof that Tom Meighan is innocent. He’s an oddball that James lad Even Tom doesn’t claim to be innocent as much as James says he is Reminds me of that crazed fan on Alan Partridge when he goes back to his house |
|
|
|
Post by bt95 on Jan 15, 2023 17:57:59 GMT -5
And we know this stops rock stars from having sex ! 🤣 Look this was just a joke people got wild for no fuckin reason it’s just crazy I just had a good time that night and remember that we laughed about it with the wife. No big deal Valid! It's a shame anyway for Noel and Sara and the kids. But such is life ey. |
|
|
|
Post by Nyron Nosworthy on Jan 15, 2023 17:58:10 GMT -5
Or how Noel’s divorce is proof that Tom Meighan is innocent. He’s an oddball that James lad Even Tom doesn’t claim to be innocent as much as James says he is Reminds me of that crazed fan on Alan Partridge when he goes back to his house  His videos can be interesting but the Tom Meighan one was toe-curlingly cringeworthy. "We had a fight mate, that's all it was!" "It's all Serge's fault!" |
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Jan 15, 2023 18:45:15 GMT -5
I heard Sara came home from the spa and found Noel using a squatty potty. That was the beginning of the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Jan 15, 2023 18:51:12 GMT -5
Liam posted a "?" on his Twitter today and Bonehead responded with "??". I've always been more team Liam but I'm disappointed he did that. I'm actually disappointed in both of them. Very childish stuff What did it mean? |
|
|
|
Post by didthedamage on Jan 15, 2023 19:24:22 GMT -5
I guess we know why Noel took the WBTM cover off the bass drum and replaced it with the smiley face.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sadie on Jan 15, 2023 19:32:04 GMT -5
Liam posted a "?" on his Twitter today and Bonehead responded with "??". I've always been more team Liam but I'm disappointed he did that. I'm actually disappointed in both of them. Very childish stuff What did it mean? I don't think it had any deeper meaning tbh, I'm hoping the other post was a joke cause I genuinely can't tell what's wrong with the tweet |
|
|
|
Post by Officer Jim Kurring on Jan 15, 2023 19:43:02 GMT -5
Hopefully Noël hits the town with the also new divorcèé Tom Brady for a wild night to forget boring married life….
God bless.
|
|
|
|
Post by standbymoi on Jan 15, 2023 20:16:24 GMT -5
Hahahahaha I came back on here to see what the reaction to this would be… noel having an orgy with his band mates led to divorce 🤣🤣🤣🤣good stuff ppl Hang on, when Noel said in 2011 he wanted his band to be like Fleetwood Mac, I thought... I think in 2011 he was meaning the Peter Green Fleetwood Mac. Nowadays I reckon he’d probably say the Rumours Fleetwood Mac |
|
|
|
Post by standbymoi on Jan 15, 2023 20:40:13 GMT -5
I think it’s possible Noel will turn into a bit of a born again lad now he’s free & single. I can see him meeting up with Liam for drinks in a couple of years or so to reminisce of the glory days and take the p*ss out of each other.
Look what happened when he bumped into Damon Albarn, it was suddenly all water under the bridge, laughing it off and even collaborating together.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheisloved on Jan 15, 2023 21:50:52 GMT -5
I don't think it had any deeper meaning tbh, I'm hoping the other post was a joke cause I genuinely can't tell what's wrong with the tweet Well shortly afterwards he shared about 6 or 7 songs and one of them was "99 Problems" by Jay Z lol So ya he definitely was sending a message |
|
|
|
Post by sheisloved on Jan 15, 2023 21:53:50 GMT -5
I don't think it had any deeper meaning tbh, I'm hoping the other post was a joke cause I genuinely can't tell what's wrong with the tweet Well shortly afterwards he shared about 6 or 7 songs and one of them was "99 Problems" by Jay Z lol So ya he definitely was sending a message Oh and on a positive note he ended with a voice over version of him singing "Step Out"... Which I think it would be amazing if he brought that into his live shows next time around. Anyhow...back to Noel. |
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jan 15, 2023 22:07:51 GMT -5
He’s an oddball that James lad Even Tom doesn’t claim to be innocent as much as James says he is Reminds me of that crazed fan on Alan Partridge when he goes back to his house His videos can be interesting but the Tom Meighan one was toe-curlingly cringeworthy. "We had a fight mate, that's all it was!" "It's all Serge's fault!" His Tom videos were fucking weird. Bottom line, at the end of the day he did hit his future wife. It might have been alcohol infused but he did do the act. It's that simple. |
|
|
|
Post by The Chief on Jan 15, 2023 22:09:09 GMT -5
I guess we know why Noel took the WBTM cover off the bass drum and replaced it with the smiley face. Well the fact that he's no longer touring that record probably has more to do with it than the divorce. |
|
|
|
Post by walterglass on Jan 15, 2023 22:11:56 GMT -5
I am talking about about kids. From my point of view, with overpopulation a big concern and the impacts of climate change beginning to be felt globally, more people ought to consider abstaining from having children on moral principle. I don't see the world becoming carbon neutral anytime soon. My generations children will massively suffer in 50 years, if not sooner. I don't wish to contribute to the problem. An easy choice. Climate change is a result of the industrial/technological sectors. It’s on those sectors - along with government - to tackle the issue moving forward. If you think there’s a moral responsibility or legitimate benefit from you denying yourself the joy of parenthood in your short life, well I feel really sad and sorry for you. How depressing. |
|
|
|
Post by glider on Jan 15, 2023 23:17:28 GMT -5
Be Here Now Remix is imminent then?  |
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Jan 16, 2023 0:06:58 GMT -5
From my point of view, with overpopulation a big concern and the impacts of climate change beginning to be felt globally, more people ought to consider abstaining from having children on moral principle. I don't see the world becoming carbon neutral anytime soon. My generations children will massively suffer in 50 years, if not sooner. I don't wish to contribute to the problem. An easy choice. Climate change is a result of the industrial/technological sectors. It’s on those sectors - along with government - to tackle the issue moving forward. If you think there’s a moral responsibility or legitimate benefit from you denying yourself the joy of parenthood in your short life, well I feel really sad and sorry for you. How depressing. They make a product they sell to consumers. Products necessary in all modern areas of life. Tech is sticking around. Global population is rising. More people born = increasing use of tech. More tech = greater carbon emissions. Greater carbon emissions = faster climate decline. We know it will take decades or longer to get governments to cooperate appropriately to address the problem. It will take decades to build the infrastructure and equipment capable of solving the problem. Climate change is already at rapid pace. We don't have the time. Every person consuming modern technology holds a level of accountability for the pollution they caused the environment. It is not just on governments or businesses to mitigate or prevent disaster. It is on everyone. It's a global problem caused by the presence of our species. But yes, the government and technological sectors should be the ones paying for the solution. We can contribute smaller aid.
There's an objective benefit to denying parenthood at the moment because of a smaller carbon footprint. I promise, it won't be a joy to bring a child into a world where they face starvation and water insecurity, war and destitution. It's literally already happening and becoming more common in larger swathes of the globe. You're completely right that it is depressing. That's not the world that I want any children to experience. And I don't intend to pawn my responsibility off on those who will suffer the most just so that I can live the ideal life that I'd prefer. That's just selfishness. So yes, some people are going to have to make the hard choices and self-sacrifice of parenthood to stall population growth. That buys us the time we'd need to solve the problem. If we don't do that, there's not going to be a kind or bright future for your children and grandchildren to live in and I'd hope that you wouldn't want your children to suffer from something completely preventable. If preventing global catastrophe and the extinction of a million species isn't a moral responsibility or benefit to humanity, then nothing is.
|
|
|
|
Post by walterglass on Jan 16, 2023 0:20:05 GMT -5
Climate change is a result of the industrial/technological sectors. It’s on those sectors - along with government - to tackle the issue moving forward. If you think there’s a moral responsibility or legitimate benefit from you denying yourself the joy of parenthood in your short life, well I feel really sad and sorry for you. How depressing. They make a product they sell to consumers. Products necessary in all modern areas of life. Tech is sticking around. Global population is rising. More people born = increasing use of tech. More tech = greater carbon emissions. Greater carbon emissions = faster climate decline. We know it will take decades or longer to get governments to cooperate appropriately to address the problem. It will take decades to build the infrastructure and equipment capable of solving the problem. Climate change is already at rapid pace. We don't have the time. Every person consuming modern technology holds a level of accountability for the pollution they caused the environment. It is not just on governments or businesses to mitigate or prevent disaster. It is on everyone. It's a global problem caused by the presence of our species. But yes, the government and technological sectors should be the ones paying for the solution. We can contribute smaller aid.
There's an objective benefit to denying parenthood at the moment because of a smaller carbon footprint. I promise, it won't be a joy to bring a child into a world where they face starvation and water insecurity, war and destitution. It's literally already happening and becoming more common in larger swathes of the globe. You're completely right that it is depressing. That's not the world that I want any children to experience. And I don't intend to pawn my responsibility off on those who will suffer the most just so that I can live the ideal life that I'd prefer. That's just selfishness. So yes, some people are going to have to make the hard choices and self-sacrifice of parenthood to stall population growth. That buys us the time we'd need to solve the problem. If we don't do that, there's not going to be a kind or bright future for your children and grandchildren to live in and I'd hope that you wouldn't want your children to suffer from something completely preventable.
Stop panicking. You/we are not the problem. Live. |
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Jan 16, 2023 0:23:49 GMT -5
They make a product they sell to consumers. Products necessary in all modern areas of life. Tech is sticking around. Global population is rising. More people born = increasing use of tech. More tech = greater carbon emissions. Greater carbon emissions = faster climate decline. We know it will take decades or longer to get governments to cooperate appropriately to address the problem. It will take decades to build the infrastructure and equipment capable of solving the problem. Climate change is already at rapid pace. We don't have the time. Every person consuming modern technology holds a level of accountability for the pollution they caused the environment. It is not just on governments or businesses to mitigate or prevent disaster. It is on everyone. It's a global problem caused by the presence of our species. But yes, the government and technological sectors should be the ones paying for the solution. We can contribute smaller aid.
There's an objective benefit to denying parenthood at the moment because of a smaller carbon footprint. I promise, it won't be a joy to bring a child into a world where they face starvation and water insecurity, war and destitution. It's literally already happening and becoming more common in larger swathes of the globe. You're completely right that it is depressing. That's not the world that I want any children to experience. And I don't intend to pawn my responsibility off on those who will suffer the most just so that I can live the ideal life that I'd prefer. That's just selfishness. So yes, some people are going to have to make the hard choices and self-sacrifice of parenthood to stall population growth. That buys us the time we'd need to solve the problem. If we don't do that, there's not going to be a kind or bright future for your children and grandchildren to live in and I'd hope that you wouldn't want your children to suffer from something completely preventable.
Stop panicking. You/we are not the problem. Live. Shakes head in disappointment, but no surprise. |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5