|
Post by girllikeabomb on Jun 10, 2021 11:54:44 GMT -5
I'm sure he doesn't care, but he surely won't be winning many friends in the US with his "woke snowflake" comments. He really makes it hard to like him at all. He's practically becoming Van Morrison. Just glad he's not writing songs like "Why Are You On Facebook."
Hilarious that anyone says this is the alternative to being bland. As if taking the side of the aristocracy is some kind of bold revolutionary move. What? No, this isn't about being some big rebel. Britain is a more conservative country in general, and I don't care what he thinks about economics, but calling people who call out racism "woke snowflakes" isn't cheeky or rebellious. It's just a massive turnoff.
|
|
|
Post by dampcottage on Jun 10, 2021 13:14:16 GMT -5
Without getting involved in the latest "controversy", just wondering why everyone seems to refer to "prince" harry, did he not give up his titles? Same with "princess" diana, was she not divorced and therefore no longer titled?
|
|
|
Post by His Royal Noelness on Jun 10, 2021 13:35:07 GMT -5
Without getting involved in the latest "controversy", just wondering why everyone seems to refer to "prince" harry, did he not give up his titles? Same with "princess" diana, was she not divorced and therefore no longer titled? It’s royalty. None of it makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by dampcottage on Jun 10, 2021 13:40:45 GMT -5
Without getting involved in the latest "controversy", just wondering why everyone seems to refer to "prince" harry, did he not give up his titles? Same with "princess" diana, was she not divorced and therefore no longer titled? It’s royalty. None of it makes sense. Sense does tend to go out the window after generations upon generations of inbreeding...
|
|