|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 19, 2019 16:22:22 GMT -5
We've gotten 7 albums and multiple EPs since 2009, do you think we would've gotten that with Oasis? Definitely not. I like it more this way, think about it, it took Oasis 18 years to get 7 albums.
|
|
|
Post by stillilllife on Nov 19, 2019 17:06:10 GMT -5
We've gotten 7 albums and multiple EPs since 2009, do you think we would've gotten that with Oasis? Definitely not. I like it more this way, think about it, it took Oasis 18 years to get 7 albums. I'd rather have quality than quantity though.
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 19, 2019 17:09:48 GMT -5
Fine, we've gotten 6 good albums and who built the moon.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Nov 19, 2019 20:09:19 GMT -5
Fine, we've gotten 6 good albums and who built the moon. Agreed. Everything since the split has been great (Not every single track, but overall), and it's annoying when people just compare everything to the 'sacred' first two albums.
|
|
|
Post by Aman on Nov 19, 2019 20:28:52 GMT -5
6 good albums is a massive stretch lol.
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 19, 2019 20:38:49 GMT -5
Noel's first two albums were really good. BE is almost as unreasonably hated as HC, such a good record. DGSS was critically acclaimed as Liams best work since MG, so that speaks for itself. As you were is considered by fans and critics alike as great. WMWN was a critical and commercial success.
I swear, people say things just to have a different take on something. Six good albums is totally reasonable.
|
|
|
Post by Aman on Nov 19, 2019 20:40:11 GMT -5
Beady Eye had no good albums.
Some good songs here and there sure but neither album is of quality.
|
|
|
Post by Aman on Nov 19, 2019 20:41:08 GMT -5
What mad bastards thought DGSS was Liam's best work since WTSMG? 😂
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 19, 2019 21:12:13 GMT -5
What mad bastards thought DGSS was Liam's best work since WTSMG? 😂 Q.
|
|
|
Post by stillilllife on Nov 20, 2019 11:37:42 GMT -5
DGSS was critically acclaimed as Liams best work since MG, so that speaks for itself Nope. That speaks for the critics who were positive about it.
|
|
|
Post by ricardogce on Nov 20, 2019 11:47:41 GMT -5
DGSS was critically acclaimed as Liams best work since MG, so that speaks for itself Nope. That speaks for the critics who were positive about it. It is a truth universally acknowledged that any Oasis/Gallagher album must be referred to as either "a return to form" or "their best since MG" by clueless journos afraid to miss the boat if the album is a hit.
|
|
|
Post by freddy838 on Nov 20, 2019 12:15:35 GMT -5
Beady Eye had no good albums. Some good songs here and there sure but neither album is of quality. I think that's fair. BE is probably my least favourite selections of songs I've ever purchased. Dave Sitek did well to mask some of the shitness with his production. Conversely Dave Sardy brought down Noel's debut with his shit production of some decent songs. Personally I enjoy Chasing Yesterday, As You Were and Why Me? Why Not as albums and a handful of tunes from all the other records. We are probably still better off than if Oasis had just released a couple of albums in the same time.
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 20, 2019 13:21:15 GMT -5
Nope. That speaks for the critics who were positive about it. It is a truth universally acknowledged that any Oasis/Gallagher album must be referred to as either "a return to form" or "their best since MG" by clueless journos afraid to miss the boat if the album is a hit. So clueless that they have a job as a professional music journalist with a multimillion dollar company. Where do you work?
|
|
|
Post by thomaslivesforever on Nov 20, 2019 13:36:21 GMT -5
It is a truth universally acknowledged that any Oasis/Gallagher album must be referred to as either "a return to form" or "their best since MG" by clueless journos afraid to miss the boat if the album is a hit. So clueless that they have a job as a professional music journalist with a multimillion dollar company. Where do you work? You speak like working for a multi million dollar company guarantee’s honesty.
|
|
|
Post by ricardogce on Nov 20, 2019 13:54:27 GMT -5
It is a truth universally acknowledged that any Oasis/Gallagher album must be referred to as either "a return to form" or "their best since MG" by clueless journos afraid to miss the boat if the album is a hit. So clueless that they have a job as a professional music journalist with a multimillion dollar company. Where do you work? I work for a multimillion dollar company, but I'm paid for my actual expertise, not to try to appear like an authority on a subjective topic.
|
|
|
Post by Jgrp on Nov 20, 2019 15:17:55 GMT -5
I tweeted Liam couple of hours ago saying ‘I recon you should tweet about this flare. Poor girl. Put numpties off doing it again at your gigs. No place for flares.’
Good to see him tweet on it
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 20, 2019 15:52:31 GMT -5
So clueless that they have a job as a professional music journalist with a multimillion dollar company. Where do you work? I work for a multimillion dollar company, but I'm paid for my actual expertise, not to try to appear like an authority on a subjective topic. Emphasis on journalist, burger king workers work for a multimillion dollar company. My point, is that they are definitely not clueless, they are however, dishonest.
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 20, 2019 15:55:45 GMT -5
So clueless that they have a job as a professional music journalist with a multimillion dollar company. Where do you work? You speak like working for a multi million dollar company guarantee’s honesty. Nope, that's a narrative you pinned on me. You either tragically misread it or are just lying. I said that they aren't clueless, hence their massive paychecks. They are however dishonest sometimes. That is beside the point.
|
|
|
Post by ricardogce on Nov 20, 2019 16:05:09 GMT -5
I work for a multimillion dollar company, but I'm paid for my actual expertise, not to try to appear like an authority on a subjective topic. Emphasis on journalist, burger king workers work for a multimillion dollar company. You're the one that brought up company worth as an indicator of trustworthiness or reliability. If you now want to downplay that because my answer didn't allow you to complete the gotcha moment you were hoping for, maybe you shouldn't have gone there to begin with. They can be one, the other, or - in some special cases - both. Are you a music journalist? You seem to be taking this awfully personal.
|
|
|
Post by thomaslivesforever on Nov 20, 2019 16:06:14 GMT -5
You speak like working for a multi million dollar company guarantee’s honesty. Nope, that's a narrative you pinned on me. You either tragically misread it or are just lying. I said that they aren't clueless, hence their massive paychecks. They are however dishonest sometimes. That is beside the point. Nothing about your post or mine is tragic but cheers for the hyperbole. They are more than just dishonest at times, they have agenda’s, ingrained snobbery and yes, are also clueless (see saying Oasis sound like the Beatles, rinse repeat).
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 20, 2019 16:13:30 GMT -5
Gotcha moment?? Are we on FOX news? I never said that, in fact, it seems that you're attempting a gotcha moment by saying I said it indicated truthfulness. I never denied that they are liars and or have an agenda. I didn't claim to be a music journalist, I just said that people that are music critics have a degree of expertise in that area, there's a reason people read what they say and they get paid for it, whether they're legitimate or not.
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 20, 2019 16:16:02 GMT -5
Nope, that's a narrative you pinned on me. You either tragically misread it or are just lying. I said that they aren't clueless, hence their massive paychecks. They are however dishonest sometimes. That is beside the point. Nothing about your post or mine is tragic but cheers for the hyperbole. They are more than just dishonest at times, they have agenda’s, ingrained snobbery and yes, are also clueless (see saying Oasis sound like the Beatles, rinse repeat). Do you honestly believe that these people are oblivious to the fact that they're bull shitting? Far from clueless, anything but.
|
|
|
Post by ricardogce on Nov 20, 2019 16:23:18 GMT -5
Gotcha moment?? Are we on FOX news? I never said that, in fact, it seems that you're attempting a gotcha moment by saying I said it indicated truthfulness. Actually, I said "reliability" or "trustworthiness", not "truthfulness". You are most welcome to argue the words I actually used, but not to put words in my mouth.
|
|
|
Post by Zingbot on Nov 20, 2019 16:28:37 GMT -5
Gotcha moment?? Are we on FOX news? I never said that, in fact, it seems that you're attempting a gotcha moment by saying I said it indicated truthfulness. Actually, I said "reliability" or "trustworthiness", not "truthfulness". You are most welcome to argue the words I actually used, but not to put words in my mouth. So you're actually upset that I used a direct synonym of what you said? That's not much of an argument.
|
|
|
Post by thomaslivesforever on Nov 20, 2019 16:32:39 GMT -5
Actually, I said "reliability" or "trustworthiness", not "truthfulness". You are most welcome to argue the words I actually used, but not to put words in my mouth. So you're actually upset that I used a direct synonym of what you said? That's not much of an argument. You’re an angry young man aren’t you. Like Weller, without the tunes.
|
|